Midterm

3) Explain the various stages of development that Siddhartha goes through. How effective is Siddhartha's philosophy of detachment as a response to nihilism?

In life we all go through different stages. In the novel “Siddhartha” by Hermann Hesse we encounter the character of Siddhartha who goes through various stages of development in his life to find oneness. The various stages Siddhartha goes through are first being the son of the Brahman, becoming a Samana, meeting Gotama, awakening from the teachings, the second stage is meeting Kamala, realizing he was living like the childlike people, realizing his life is like the game of Sansara, watching the river and wanting to die, seeing the ferryman again, discovering he had a son, seeing life through Om and finally reaching enlightenment.  These stages are effective in Siddhartha’s philosophy of detachment as a response to nihilism.

The first stage is being the son of the Brahman where Siddhartha’s life begins. He is not satisfied with this life and wishes to know more than what the Brahman’s teachings offer him, he wishes to find more knowledge and become enlighten. He decides to leave his father and follow the ways of the Samanas. He and his good friend Govinda become Samanas and follow their way of life for years. Here Siddhartha learns to fast, to think and to wait and also learns to cast spells on others. After so many years with the Samana’s still feels discontent and with Govinda after hearing many rumors decide to find a wise man named Gotama the Buddha. Siddhartha finds Gotama’s teachings interesting and wishes to be enlighten like him and realizes that by following Gotama’s teachings he won’t be able to be enlighten on less he experiences what Gotama has experience in life in order to have become enlighten. He leaves Gotama and his friend Govinda decides to stay behind and become a monk. After his talk with Gotama Siddhartha is awaken to a new life, one in which the teachings won’t be part of his life. With no destination Siddhartha decides to go to the city and on his way encounter a ferryman. He becomes enchanted be the river and expresses he sentiments to the ferryman about the river and gives the man his friendship since he is unable to pay the fair. The ferryman accepts seeing that Siddhartha is a Samana and tells him that he will pay him one day and return to the river.

The second stage of Siddhartha leads him to the city were he meets Kamala. He becomes enchanted by her and wishes to please her in any way possible and he asks her to teach him the art of sex. She requests that he get clean, money for gifts and is well dressed in order to be his teacher. Because he has no skill to offer other than fasting, waiting and thinking Kamala finds him a job with a merchant named Kamaswami. He becomes Kamaswami’s equal and learns the ways of the merchant, even though he mocks the man for being too worried about his losses in business and his dependence of wealth, Siddhartha ends up becoming like him. He becomes bitter, starves for more money, gambles, drinks and lives like a wealthy man, all the things he mocked and hated. He realizes that he has become like the childlike people around him who took from life but were not actually living for enlightenment. He analyzes his life and compares it to the game of Sansara and becomes sick with the thought of having no purpose in life and wants to runaway, which he does. He leaves everything behind and returns to the river. He is desolated and wanted to end his meaningless life. When he was about to end his life the river talks to him and he becomes amazed. He falls into a deep sleep that brightens his thoughts and he is reborn. When he wakes he finds a monk sitting close by and realizes is his friend Govinda. Govinda does not recognize him at first because of his clothing. Govinda is amazed with his friend’s change and Siddhartha exclaims to him the he is on a pilgrimage. They say their goodbyes and Siddhartha decides he wants to start from the beginning were everything changed for him in the river. He encounters the ferryman and learns his name Vasudeva. At first Vasudeva did not recognize like Govinda and Siddhartha tells him his tale and that the river spoke to him. Vasudeva is pleased with this and is happy for Siddhartha to join him and to learn from the river. He learns different skills from the ferryman and learns from the river as well. Word goes around about to wise man living by the river and many go to confirm the claims. Later there is news that Gotama is dying and many go to see him for the last time and in those many Kamala and her son are among them. Sadly she is bitten by a snake and tells Siddhartha of his son and dies. Siddhartha is happy to have a son but the boy is not happy living by the river and runs away to the city. Siddhartha follows him with no success and finds that Vasudeva was right behind him. They return to the river and he is very sad for the lost of his son. He tells the ferryman his fears and all that is in his heart and realizes that the ferryman is enlighten as a Buddha. The ferryman tells him the Om prayer for the Brahman’s to help him. The ferryman tells Siddhartha to listen closely to the river and his life passes before his eyes and that’s when he realizes that he has found himself and does not second-guess his actions. Vasudeva sees the change in Siddhartha and leaves him as the ferryman. After the death of Gotama, Govinda returns to the river looking for the wise man that everyone is talking about. At first he does not recognize Siddhartha and asks him how he found enlightenment. Siddhartha explains that enlightenment cannot be thought but has to be experienced. He kisses Govinda in the forehead and all the images of his life pass through his eyes. Govinda is amazed and with tears on his eyes bows down to Siddhartha whose face is that of an enlighten Buddha and with this they have both found the enlightenment that they as youth set out to find.

The philosophy of detachment is effective in the stages that Siddhartha goes to in response to nihilism because since the beginning of his life with the Brahman’s he question their teachings and knowledge typical of nihilism. He wanted to know more and why things were the way they were and how were the Gods, gods and how they passed their teachings. He question many things especially religion. In nihilism people goes against the norms. Siddhartha reached a down fall in his life with the gambling, drinking and wanting more money a typical characteristic related to nihilism. Destruction is always expected and not denied but at the end Siddhartha was able to wake and righten his path.
4) Explain the statement, "boredom is nothing other than the dissolution of pain in time", (Jünger p. 13) and its relationship to nihilism

      The book “On Pain” by Ernst Jünger has a close relationship to nihilism. His work touches the darkness of life and the pain that is behind everything we do in life. Jünger believes that pain is our goal in life with the things we do. There is no complete happiness, in the background there will always be pain hiding. Jünger thoughts of pain are relatively characteristics of nihilism.

In his book on page 13 Jünger states that, "boredom is nothing other than the dissolution of pain in time", this quotes relates to nihilism. In nihilism pain is inedible because it leads many times to the destruction of a person. To not believe in anything and have no purpose in life and lead to people to destroy themselves in the process of running away from the norms. Boredom plays an important key in the way people can change their lives because they become bored with the things around them.  

      In conclusion Jünger statement relates to nihilism because people involved in nihilism are usually bored of their way of living and seek for something more like in the case of Siddhartha. Being bore leads to pain in his opinion. In nihilism since norms are not followed this can lead to a person’s destruction. Siddhartha was a young man that wanted more and ended up finding lust, gambling, ambition and drinking. This was destroying him and when he realizes that this life had taken him away from the path of enlightenment he leaves everything behind and wishes to end his life but finds a river that gives him meaning in life once more. Jünger’s statement relates to nihilism and can be identified in Siddhartha. 

On Pain

Assignment: Please choose a passage from the essay on one of the following themes: pain, technology, photography, detachment, sexuality.

Write out the passage. Interpret the passage and explain how it relates to one of the other works we have looked at. Explain why you chose this passage.
 “Pain is one of the keys to unlocks man's innermost being as well as the world. Whenever one approaches the points where man proves himself to be equal or superior to pain, one gains access to the sources of his power and the secret hidden behind his dominion. Tell me your relation to pain, and I will tell you who you are!" (pg. 1).
    Pain is the reason why many people are able to become strong. In order to know yourself you most suffer pain. Nothing in life is easy, but those who do have it easy tend not to appreciate it. Hard work and disappointment give you strength. 
    This passage from On Pain by Ernest Junger relates to the movie "The Blue Angel". The reason for this is because Professor Rath suffered great pain with Lola's betrayal. He was weak and couldn't handle the betrayal since he had abandoned everything he knew for her. If he would have been stronger mentally he would had learned from his mistake and could had been able to prove to her that he didn't need her. His pain consumed him and destroyed him.
    The reason why I choose this passage was because I'm a firm believer that without there is no lesson learned. I think going through pain makes you stronger and smarter.

Dream Story

Assignment: Please choose a quote from Dream Story write out the quote. Then interpret the quote and explain why you chose this passage.

               A few seconds later he felt a soft hand stroking his hair. He raised his head and from the bottom of his heart cried, ‘I’ll tell you everything.’

            At first she gently raised her hand as if to prevent him, but he seized it and held it in his own, both questioning her and pleading with her as he looked up, so she nodded her consent and he began.

            By the time Fridolin had ended the first grey light of dawn was coming through the curtains. Albertine had not once interrupted him with curious or impatient questions. She seemed to sense that he had no desire to conceal anything from her, that he was indeed unable to. She lay there quietly, her hands behind her neck, and remained silent a long time after Fridolin had finished. At last – he had been lying stretched out by her side – he bent over her and, gazing into her impassive face and large bright eyes, in which the day now seemed to be dawning too, asked hesitantly yet full of hope, ‘What should we do, Albertine?’

            She smiled, hesitated briefly, then answered, ‘I think we should be grateful to fate that we’ve emerged safely from these adventures – both from the real ones and from those we dreamed about.’

            ‘Are you quite sure of that?’ he asked.

            ‘As sure as I am of my sense that neither the reality of a single night nor even of a person’s entire life can be equated with the full truth about his innermost being.’

            ‘And no dream,’ he sighed quietly, ‘is altogether a dream.’

            She took his head in both her hands and pillowed it tenderly against her breast. ‘Now we’re truly awake,’ she said, ‘at least for a good while.’ He wanted to add: for ever. But before he had a chance to speak, she laid a finger on his lips and whispered as though to herself, ‘Never inquire into the future.’

            And so they both lay there in silence, both dozing now and then, yet dreamlessly close to one another – until, as every morning at seven, there was a knock upon the bedroom door and, with the usual noises from the street, a triumphant sunbeam coming in between the curtains, and a child’s gay laughter from the adjacent room, another day began.

I chose this passage from pages 98 and 99 the ending of the book because it seemed so real and at the same time so unreal. It seemed real because Fridolin was telling Albertine his feelings and the events that had taken place and the chances he had to cheat on her. At the same time it seemed unreal because is hard to picture another person being truthful and saying the truth about their feelings. This passage is both revealing and unrevealing because Fridolin reveals his feelings and unrevealing because Albertine doesn’t want to think about the future and she wants them to live in the present knowing their true feelings and thoughts about their relationship. At the end having their daughter’s laughter to remind them of what they have together was very nice. Even though they had fantasies with other people I think is actually normal because is human nature to picture yourself with someone else or another life, but at the end family and love call you back to reality. The human mind thrives  on the imagination we all like to imagine different things whether if we were rich, another nationality, etc. At the end Fridolin and Albertine know that they love each other and that their fantasies are just fantasies and that they wouldn't hurt their family or themselves.

 

The Blue Angel

The Blue Angel

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari

Assignment: Using the two films identify three major themes that you can find through both films. Explain how the films develop these themes and what do they mean. How do these themes relate to the theme of nihilism we have been discussing? Examples of themes could be ‘love’ or ‘madness’. So for example you would explain what are the the themes of love you find in both films how do they relate, how are these themes developed and how does it relate to nihilism.
The relationship between the rational/irrational displayed in the film work hand in hand to give the film the ending that is expected when someone ruins their life without realizing it. Films like this and Caligari seem to show the irrational world as something inherently destructive and dangerous but it really is not. In Caligari, Francis imagination was the one that created this great tale of murder to escape his reality in the asylum and that was his world and he was content with it to a point. In Blue Angel, Professor Rath was not used to the life that Lola was used to and it became his down fall. If he had become used to that life he wouldn't have died of a broken heart. I believe this film is nihilistic because is shows the destruction of an individual that decides to leave his morals and traditional notions behind to be with the woman he believes he is in love with, but in reality is infatuated with lust for her. Caligari on the other hand isn't nihilist because it focuses on traditional notions of morality with Francis wanting to get the killer of his best friend Alan and also letting Jane decide with whom she wants to be with without any pressure. Professor Rath is who he is because of his own pompousness and stuffiness and inner weakness incapable of enjoying and appreciating the pleasures of the world which his lifestyle has habituated him to not enjoy because he is used to a world of rules. He believes that by following the rules you can have a life that is not corrupted by people like Lola until he meets her in person and is mesmerized by her. The world that Lola inhabits is bad in itself and would lead anyone to destruction. She is used to that lifestyle and enjoys it because she doesn't have to follow any rules but her own, Rath is used to following the rules of society in order to be respected.
                 Using both films three major themes that I found were love, love triangle and madness/insanity. The films develop these themes and their meanings in different ways. Lets start first with The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, love is developed through this film with the loyalty that Francis has for his friend Alan. He does anything in his power to get the person responsible for his friend's death and even starts neglecting the love Jane has for him in order to achieve his goal. Secondly, the love triangle is seen with Francis and Alan being in love with Jane but she loves Francis. Even though they promise to still be friends no matter her decision you can fell the tension between them when Jane is around.  Lastly, madness/insanity at the end of the film is that we see that the story that Francis has told the old man is all in his imagination and that in reality Cesare, Jane and himself are patients at the asylum and that Dr. Caligari and Alan are taking care of them to make them better. When it comes to The Blue Angel, love is more like lust because Professor Rath becomes infatuated with Lola causing him to leave everything behind for her without thinking about the consequences. Secondly, the love triangle is seen at the end of the film which is Lola's love for attention of men like the Strongman and the fact that she is willing to leave Rath for another suitor that could give her the things she wanted that Rath couldn't anymore. Plus the love triangle was with the lifestyle Lola was used to and enjoy and that was destroying Rath little by little. Lastly, madness/insanity Rath at the end of the film becomes enraged to see Lola with someone else after being humiliated by the people that once had respected him for being a professor. At that moment he snapped and became insane and died of a broken heart.
                 These themes relate to the theme of nihilism we have discussed because they represent the destruction of an individual who stops believing in morality and social norms. After all nihilism is consider at times a state of mind and mood of despair an individual is facing. Both Francis and Professor Rath ended up in a state of despair and perceive their lives as pointless and upon realizing that their existence is pointless they feel is not necessary anymore to follow norms, rules, or laws.

Assignment

We have gone over painting and photography, literature, and now film. What have you enjoyed about the class so far and what have you not liked if anything?

I have enjoyed about the class so far is the fact that we have our own blogs and can be creative and express our thoughts. The only thing I didn't like was with the first film I was lost and didn't understand what was going on. In order to understand it I had to watch the remake. So far I have enjoyed the class very much and have learned things I didn't know about Germany before Hitler since everyone focus on the things that took place during his reign.   

Quiz#1

1. What is nihilism? Is it correct to say it is the belief in nothing?
Nihilism is the philosophical belief that suggest the negation of one or more commonly meaningful aspects of life. Nihilism has different forms such as existential nihilism, moral nihilism, epistemological, metaphysical or ontological. Existential nihilism argues that life is without objective meaning, purpose or intrinsic value. Moral nihilism argues that morality does not inherently exist, and that any moral values a person has are abstractly contrived. The other forms of nihilism argue that knowledge is not possible and that some aspects of reality do not exist as such, contrary to the majority of believes. Sometimes nihilism is used to explain the general mood of despair "perceived pointlessness of existence that one may develop upon realizing there are no necessary norms, rules or laws".  It not exactly correct to say that it is the belief in nothing because there are different forms of nihilism and just because you agree with one form it does not mean you agree with the other.

2. What are the differences between Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian values according to Nietzsche? Which values does he believe are better for living a full and healthy life and why?

The difference between Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian values according to Nietzsche is that Roman culture and civilization are built on violence and oppression. While Christian goes against instincts, wants, desires on the side and conscious will and values. The values he believes are better for living a full and healthy life is man nature which enables him to achieve his goals and wants in life.
3. Why is Dada art so pessimistic and bizzare? What groups in Germany society where Dada artists trying to discredit and undermine?
Dada art is so pessimistic and bizzare because the artist involve in this movement shared their dislike of the war with comical art that would offend the parties involve in the war. The groups in Germany society that Dada artists were trying to discredit and undermine were the government officials, "the president" dictator and the military involve in the war.
4. How many jobs does Dr. Caligari have in the film?
Dr. Caligari has two jobs in the film. One is being the head of the institute and the second is sleepwalker.
5. Why does Siddhartha leave his father?
Siddhartha leaves his father after encountering a couple of ill fortune men. He decides to become a Samana and learn the meaning of life. He searches for total spiritual enlightenment.
6. How does Cesare "die" in the film?
Cesare "dies" in the film of a heart attack when he is running away from Francis.
7. Why is the river so important to Siddharta at the end of the novel? 

The river is important to Siddharta at the end of the novel because it represents life itself, time, and the path to enlightenment.

Siddhartha

Once you have chosen a passage please do the following and post it on your blog before next  class. 1) Write out the passage; 2) Explain the meaning of the passage; 3) Explain why you chose this passage.

FIRST PART

THE SON OF THE BRAHMAN

"Siddhartha had started to nurse discontent in himself, he had started to feel that the love of his father and the love of his mother, and also the love of his friend, Govinda, would not bring him joy for ever and ever, would not nurse him, feed him, satisfy him. He had started to suspect that his venerable father and his other teachers, that the wise Brahmans had already revealed to him the most and best of their wisdom, that they had already filled his expecting vessel with their richness, and the vessel was not full, the spirit was not content, the soul was not calm, the heart was not satisfied. The ablutions were good, but they were water, they did not wash off the sin, they did not heal the spirit's thirst, they did not relieve the fear in his heart. The sacrifices and the invocation of the gods were excellent—but was that all? Did the sacrifices give a happy fortune? And what about the gods? Was it really Prajapati who had created the world? Was it not the Atman, He, the only one, the singular one? Were the gods not creations, created like me and you, subject to time, mortal? Was it therefore good, was it right, was it meaningful and the highest occupation to make offerings to the gods? For whom else were offerings to be made, who else was to be worshipped but Him, the only one, the Atman? And where was Atman to be found, where did He reside, where did his eternal heart beat, where else but in one's own self, in its innermost part, in its indestructible part, which everyone had in himself? But where, where was this self, this innermost part, this ultimate part? It was not flesh and bone, it was neither thought nor consciousness, thus the wisest ones taught. So, where, where was it? To reach this place, the self, myself, the Atman, there was another way, which was worthwhile looking for? Alas, and nobody showed this way, nobody knew it, not the father, and not the teachers and wise men, not the holy sacrificial songs! They knew everything, the Brahmans and their holy books, they knew everything, they had taken care of everything and of more than everything, the creation of the world, the origin of speech, of food, of inhaling, of exhaling, the arrangement of the senses, the acts of the gods, they knew infinitely much—but was it valuable to know all of this, not knowing that one and only thing, the most important thing, the solely important thing?".
   This passage can be consider the starting point of Siddhartha's quest for enlightenment. He explains that he has knowledge of the things to do to be in God grace but he wants to know more. Like why is their a God and his origin. His spirit and soul are not content they wish to know more.
   The reason I choose this passage is because Siddhartha is an example of people that are born into wealth and tradition that are not satisfied with what they are given and wish to know more and be more. He was not satisfied with his world, he wanted to know what was out there.